Assessment of Quality of Life among Selected Lower Limb Amputees in South-Eastern Nigeria
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Lower limb amputation in lowincome countries such as Nigeria imposes significant economic, social, and psychological burdens. Mobility—and thus quality of life (QoL)—is shaped by prosthetic design, rehabilitation, and psychosocial adaptation.
Objective: To assess the quality of life among adult lower limb amputees in Southeastern Nigeria who had used prostheses for at least six months, and to examine the influence of sociodemographic characteristics and prosthetic componentry on rehabilitation outcomes.
Methods: A crosssectional survey of 47 amputees using prostheses for ≥6 months was conducted in two private institutions in Enugu and Imo States. Data were collected with a researcherdesigned proforma and the TAPESR questionnaire, covering psychosocial adjustment, activity restriction, and prosthetic satisfaction. Analyses employed Spearman’s correlation and MannWhitney U tests.
Results: Participants’ mean age was 50.6 years; transtibial amputation predominated (68.1%). Most used SACH feet and PTB sockets. Psychosocial adjustment was high for general (M=21.15) and social (M=21.70) domains but lower for limitation adjustment (M=16.11). Activity restriction was greatest in athletics (M=9.17). Functional satisfaction scored highest (M=20.34). Age correlated significantly with activity restriction, while suspension type correlated with limitation adjustment and weight satisfaction.
Conclusion: Despite positive psychosocial adjustment, reliance on basic prosthetic components and marked athletic restrictions highlight gaps in functional rehabilitation. Findings underscore the need for
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
How to Cite
References
1.Bernard H, Kwadwo AA, David A, Paa KB, Michael L, Ronald A, Dominic K, et al. Determinants of utilization of prostheses and orthoses following lower limb amputation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports, 2024; 100528, ISSN 2773-157X, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2024.100528
2.Sie Essoh JB, Kodo M., Dje Bi Dje V, Lambin Y. (2007). Limb Amputations in Adults in an Ivorian Teaching Hospital. Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. 2007; 12(3): 245 – 247.
3. Harkins, CS, McGarry A, Buis A. Provision of prosthetic and orthotic services in low-income 3.countries: A review of the literature. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2013; 37(5): 353-361. doi:10.1177/0309364612470963
4.Nwankwo OE, Katchy AU. Surgical Limb Amputation: A Five-Year Experience at Hill Top Orthopaedic Hospital, Enugu, Nigeria. Nigeria. Journal of Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2004; 3: 139-149
5.Yinusa W, Ugbeye ME. Problems of Amputation Surgery in a Developing Country. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2003; 27: 121-124.
6.WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a Quality of Life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Quality of Life Research. 1993; 2: 153-159.
7.Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature. 1995; 377(6549): 489-490
8.Trevelyan EG, Warren AT, Nicola R. Perceptions of Phantom Limb Pain in Lower Limb Amputees and Its Effects on Quality of Life: A Qualitative Study. British Journal of Pain. 2015; 10(2): 70-77.
9.Topuz S, Ülger Ö, Yakut Y, Gül-Şener F. Reliability and Construct Validity of The Turkish Version of The Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Experience Scales (Tapes) In Lower Limb Amputees. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2011; 35(2): 201-206.
10.Ayyappa E, Perry J, Powers CM, Torburn L. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1994; 75 (7): 825-829.
11.Beppu M, Ehara Y, Nomura S, Takahashi S. (1993). Energy Storing property of so called energy storing prosthetic feet. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1993; 74: 68-70.
12.Edeer D, Martin CW. Upper Limb Prostheses: A Review of the Literature with A Focus on Myoelectric Hands. WorksafeBC Evidence-Based Practical Group. 2011. Available at: http://worksafebc.com/health_care_providers/Assets/PDF/UpperLimbProstheses2011.pdf
13.Gallagher P, Maclachlan, M. The Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (Tapes). Rehabilitation Psychology. 2000; 45: 130-155.
14.Gallagher, P., Maclachlan M. The Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales and Quality of Life in People with Lower-Limb Amputation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2004; 85(5): 730-736.
15.Legro MW, Reiber GD, Smith DG. Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire for Persons with Lower Limb Amputations: Assessing Prosthesis-Related Quality of Life. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 1998; 79: 931-938
16.Deans SA, Mcfadyen AK, Rowe PJ. Physical Activity and Quality of Life: A Study of a Lower-Limb Amputee Population. Prosthetics and Orthotics International. 2008; 32(2): 186-200.
17.Rudney S, Julia GR, Paulo JBGF, Valmor R, Sara D. Physical activity and quality of life of amputees in southern Brazil. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2011; 35(4):432-8. doi: 10.1177/0309364611425093
18.Zidarov D, Swaine B, Gauthier-Gagnon C. Quality of Life of Persons with Lower Limb Amputation During Rehabilitation and at 3-Months Follow-Up. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 2009; 90(4): 634-645.
19.Thomas S, Malte B, Jan S, Bjorn A. Advantages and limitations of new sports prosthetic components developed for running in lower limb amputees. Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Journal. 2017; 2(3):01-08
20.Berry DW, Olson M, Larntz K. Perceived Stability, Function, and Satisfaction Among Transfemoral Amputees Using Microprocessor and Non-microprocessor Controlled Prosthetic Knees: A Multicenter Survey. Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics. 2009; 21: 32-42
21.Van der Linde H, Hofstad CJ, Geurts AC, Postema K, Geertzen J H, van Limbeek J. (2004). A systematic literature review of the effect of different prosthetic components on human functioning with a lower-limb prosthesis. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2004; 41(4): 555-570.
22.Burçak B, Kesikburun B, Köseoğlu BF, Öken, Ö, Doğan A. Quality of life, body image, and mobility in lower-limb amputees using high-tech prostheses: A pragmatic trial. Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2020; 64(1):101405. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2020.03.016. Epub 2020 Oct 18. PMID: 32561506
23.Adegoke BOA, Kehinde AO, Akosile CO, Oyeyemi AL. Quality of Life of Nigerians with Unilateral Lower Limb Amputation. Asia Specific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2012; 23(4) :79-89. doi 10.5463/DCID.v23i4.192
24.Madsen UR, Baath C, Berthelsen CB, & Hommel A. Age and health-related quality of life, general self-efficacy, and functional level 12 months following dysvascular major lower limb amputation: a prospective longitudinal study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2019; 41(24): 2900–2909. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1480668
25.Pran L, Baijoo S, Harnanan D, Slim H, Maharaj R, & Naraynsingh V. Quality of Life Experienced by Major Lower Extremity Amputees. Cureus. 2021; 13(8): e17440. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.17440
26.Webster JB, Hakimi KN, Williams RM, Turner AP, Norvell DC, & Czerniecki JM. Prosthetic fitting, use, and satisfaction following lower-limb amputation: A prospective study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2012; 49(10): 1453–1504. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2012.01.0001
27.Kenon AB, Joshua RJ, Mackenzie Q. Role of gender in evaluating athletes’ endorsement of corporate social advocacy initiative. Communication and sports. 2024; 13(1).
28.Nyimbili, F., & Nyimbili, L. (2024). Types of purposive sampling techniques with their examples and application in qualitative research studies. British Journal of Multidisciplinary and Advanced Studies: English Language, Teaching, Literature, Linguistics & Communication, 5(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.37745/bjmas.2022.0419