A Systematic Review of Training Programmes on Clinical Mentorship for Nurse and Midwife Educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v25i2.948Keywords:
clinical mentorship, mentorship training, nursing and midwifery, student mentorship, Nurse Educators, Midwife EducatorsAbstract
Background: Mentorship is a potent strategy for improving the training of nursing and midwifery students, which is essential for both quality healthcare delivery and upholding the integrity of the nursing profession. However, the absence of structured and standardised training for mentors may hinder the effectiveness of mentorship programmes. This review aimed to systematically identify and describe existing training programmes on clinical mentorship for nurse and midwife educators.
Methods: A PEO-based strategy guided the development of the research question and search terms. A comprehensive search of four databases was conducted for peer-reviewed articles published from 2015 onwards. Eligible studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, and data were synthesised using content analysis.
Results: Seven studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising two quantitative, two qualitative, and three mixed methods designs. A total of 47 codes were extracted and categorised into eight training content domains, including foundational concepts, interpersonal skills, and programme design. No study reported formal scientific validation of the training programmes, although two conducted pilot testing. Only five studies provided information on delivery mode and duration, which ranged from 3 hours to 10 weeks. Delivery modes included physical workshops, online modules, and hybrid formats, with facilitator-led, self-paced, and blended learning approaches.
Conclusion: Training programmes on clinical mentorship for nurse and midwife educators vary widely in content, duration, and delivery methods, with limited evidence of validation. There is a need for the development and evaluation of standardised, context-appropriate mentorship training programmes, particularly in underrepresented and low-resource settings.
Downloads
References
1. Busby KR, Draucker CB, Reising DL. Mentoring-as-partnership: The meaning of mentoring among novice nurse faculty. J Nurs Educ. 2023 Feb;62(2):83–8.
2. Ephraim N. Mentoring in nursing education: An essential element in the retention of new nurse faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2021;37(2):306–19.
3. World Health Organization. Universal Health Coverage (UHC). 2025.
4. Odetola TD, Oluwasola O, Pimmer C, Dipeolu O, Akande SO, Samuel Olaleye O, et al. Theory-practice gap: The experiences of Nigerian nursing students. Afr J Nurs Midwifery. 2018 Aug 22;20(1).
5. Ngozika Ugwu S, Ogbonnaya NP, Chijioke VC, Esievo JN. Causes and effects of theory-practice gap during clinical practice: The lived experiences of baccalaureate nursing students. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2023 Dec;18(1):2164949.
6. Abdullahi KO, Ghiyasvandian S, Hasanpour M. Theory-practice gap: The knowledge and perception of Nigerian nurses. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2022;27(1):30–4.
7. Moreno IM, de la Cuesta DG, Narvión MJB, Esteban MA, Cantalejo MG. Nurse mentoring: A scoping review. Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 15;11(16):2302.
8. Raines D. Effective mentoring is key to enhancing practice and developing the next generation of nurses. Evidence Based Nursing. 2019 Jan;22(1):30.
9. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097.
10. Krathwohl DR. A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Pract. 2002 Nov 1;41(4):212–8.
11. Hong QN, Pluye P, Fàbregues S, Bartlett G, Boardmann F, Cargo M, et al. Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), version 2018 [Internet]. Registration of Copyright (#1148552), Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Industry Canada. 2018 [cited 2025 Apr 15]. Available from: http://mixedmethodsappraisaltoolpublic.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/127916259/MMAT_2018_criteria-manual_2018-08-01_ENG.pdf
12. Elamin MB, Flynn DN, Bassler D, Briel M, Alonso-Coello P, Karanicolas PJ, et al. Choice of data extraction tools for systematic reviews depends on resources and review complexity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 May;62(5):506–10.
13. Gibbs DK, Culleiton AL. A project to increase educator cultural competence in mentoring at-risk nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing [Internet]. 2016 Jul;11(3):118–25. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1557308716000044
14. Harding T, Mawson K. Richness and reciprocity: Undergraduate student nurse mentoring in mental health. SAGE Open Nurs [Internet]. 2017 Jan 5;3. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2377960817706040
15. Kung PC, Huang HL, Che HL, Chou YF, Chi SF, Tseng SM. Effectiveness of clinical mentorship program for students of long-term aged care: A mixed-methods study. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2023 Jun; 125:105781. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691723000758
16. Lavoie-Tremblay M, Sanzone L, Primeau G, Lavigne GL. Group mentorship programme for graduating nursing students to facilitate their transition: A pilot study. J Nurs Manag [Internet]. 2019 Jan;27(1):66–74. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jonm.12649
17. Oikarainen A, Kaarlela V, Heiskanen M, Taam-Ukkonen M, Lehtimaja I, Kärsämänoja T, et al. Educational intervention to support development of mentors’ competence in mentoring culturally and linguistically diverse nursing students: A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2022 Sep; 116:105424. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0260691722001605
18. Sheehan A, Dahlen HG, Elmir R, Burns E, Coulton S, Sorensen K, et al. The implementation and evaluation of a mentoring program for Bachelor of Midwifery students in the clinical practice environment. Nurse Educ Pract [Internet]. 2023 Jul; 70:103687. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S147159532300149X
19. Stefaniak M, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E. Evaluation of a mentor training program for midwives in two hospitals in Warsaw, Poland - A qualitative descriptive study. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2021 Dec 15;21(1):345. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-021-02769-7
20. Stefaniak M, Dmoch-Gajzlerska E. Mentoring in the clinical training of midwifery students - A focus study of the experiences and opinions of midwifery students at the Medical University of Warsaw participating in a mentoring program. BMC Med Educ [Internet]. 2020 Dec 30;20(1):394. Available from: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12909-020-02324-w
21. Moked Z, Drach-Zahavy A. Clinical supervision and nursing students’ professional competence: Support-seeking behaviour and the attachment styles of students and mentors. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2016;72(2):316–27. Available from: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84954028101&doi=10.1111%2fjan.12838&partnerID=40&md5=8a2ad5fe49c87fc28609846d3614a382
22. Nowell L, White DE, Mrklas K, Norris JM. Mentorship in nursing academia: A systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;4(1):16.
23. Kistin C, Silverstein M. Pilot studies. JAMA. 2015 Oct 20;314(15):1561–2.
24. Abbasi Abianeh N, Yazdani S, Heydari M, Farmad SA. Global perspectives on trends in health higher education. J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Sep;11(9):4991–5003
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anthonia U. Chinweuba, Patricia Ukaigwe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The Journal is owned, published and copyrighted by the Nigerian Medical Association, River state Branch. The copyright of papers published are vested in the journal and the publisher. In line with our open access policy and the Creative Commons Attribution License policy authors are allowed to share their work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author.
The use of general descriptive names, trade names, trademarks, and so forth in this publication, even if not specifically identified, does not imply that these names are not protected by the relevant laws and regulations. While the advice and information in this journal are believed to be true and accurate on the date of its going to press, neither the authors, the editors, nor the publisher can accept any legal responsibility for any errors or omissions that may be made. The publisher makes no warranty, express or implied, with respect to the material contained herein.
TNHJ also supports open access archiving of articles published in the journal after three months of publication. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g, in institutional repositories or on their website) within the stated period, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). All requests for permission for open access archiving outside this period should be sent to the editor via email to editor@tnhjph.com.
