Kidney Function in Normotensive and Preeclamptic Pregnancies: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Abeokuta, Nigeria

Authors

  • Olusola Adebisi Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Unit, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta
  • A. K. Bakare Department of Internal Medicine, Neurology Unit, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta 
  • A. T. Vaughan Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta 
  • A. E. Faponle Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Unit, Zenith Medical and Kidney Centre, Abuja 
  • K. A. Ahmed Department of Community Medicine and Primary Care, Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta 
  • A. Odeyemi Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Unit, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja
  • O. O. Okunola Department of Internal Medicine, Nephrology Unit, Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v25i2.1091

Keywords:

Preeclampsia, kidney dysfunction, serum creatinine, cystatin C, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), Federal Medical Centre, Abeokuta, Adrenal tumor

Abstract

Background: Preeclampsia is a significant obstetric complication in Nigeria, associated with acute and long-term renal outcomes. This study compared renal function parameters in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnancies attending the antenatal clinic of the federal medical centre (FMC), Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Method: This was a comparative cross-sectional study involving 180 pregnant women (90 with preeclampsia and 90 normotensive controls) attending the antenatal clinic at FMC. Serum creatinine, cystatin C, uric acid, phosphate, calcium, and FBS were measured using standard automated spectrophotometry. Cystatin C was measured using a particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation and staged according to the KDOQI guideline. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 25.0. Student’s t-test, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exact test were used as appropriate, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: The mean eGFR was significantly lower in preeclamptic (p = 0.011). Serum cystatin C was significantly higher in the preeclamptic group (1.09 ± 0.62 mg/L vs. 0.80 ± 0.22 mg/L; p < 0.001). Kidney dysfunction (eGFR ≤ 60 mL/min) was identified in 11.1% of preeclamptic participants, and none in the control group (p < 0.001). Generalized edema, leg swelling, etc were significantly associated with kidney dysfunction among preeclamptic women (p = 0.010, 0.029, and <0.001, respectively).

Conclusion: Preeclampsia significantly increases the risk of kidney dysfunction in pregnancy. Symptoms like headache, leg swelling, and generalized edema may serve as early indicators. Routine renal function screening using cystatin C may aid in early detection and better outcomes, especially in low-resource settings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Duley L. The global impact of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia. SeminPerinatol. 2009; 33(3):130–137.

2. Steegers EA, von Dadelszen P, Duvekot JJ, Pijnenborg R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet. 2010; 376(9741):631–644.

3. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations for prevention and treatment of pre-eclampsia and eclampsia.2011. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44703

4. Roberts JM, Gammill HS. Preeclampsia: recent insights. Hypertension. 2005; 46(6):1243–1249.

5. Hladunewich MA, Karumanchi SA, Lafayette RA. Pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 2(3):543–549.

6. Karumanchi SA, Maynard SE. Still a decade of discovery in preeclampsia. Am J Kidney Dis. 2019; 74(6):751–753.

7. Cheung KL, Lafayette RA. Renal physiology of pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013; 20(3):209–214.

8. Davison JM. The kidney in pregnancy: a review. J R Soc Med. 1983; 76(10):820–827.

9. Brown MA, Lindheimer MD, de Swiet M, Van Assche A, Moutquin JM. The classification and diagnosis of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. J Hypertens. 2001; 19(11):1149–1158.

10. Hladunewich MA. Acute kidney injury in pregnancy. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2013; 20(3):215–222.

11. Levey AS, Coresh J. Chronic kidney disease. Lancet. 2012; 379(9811):165–180.

12. Stevens LA, Coresh J, Greene T, Levey AS. Assessing kidney function measured and estimated glomerular filtration rate. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(23):2473–2483.

13. Odden MC, Tager IB, Gansevoort RT, et al. Cystatin C and kidney function in the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 2012; 157(3):143–151.

14. Dharnidharka VR, Kwon C, Stevens G. Serum cystatin C is superior to serum creatinine as a marker of kidney function: a meta-analysis. PediatrNephrol. 2002; 17(12):903–907.

15. Laterza OF, Price CP, Scott MG. Cystatin C: an improved estimator of glomerular filtration rate? Clin Chem. 2002; 48(5):699–707.

16. Peralta CA, Katz R, Sarnak MJ, et al. Cystatin C identifies chronic kidney disease patients at higher risk for complications. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 22(1):147–155.

17. Strevens H, Wide-Swensson D, Grubb A, et al. Serum cystatin C for assessment of glomerular filtration rate in pregnant and nonpregnant women. Indications of altered filtration. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186(3):508–514.

18. Wattanavaekin K, Wattanavaekin T, Attia J. Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C in preeclampsia. Int J NephrolRenovasc Dis. 2018; 11:187–194.

19. Arikan DC, Ozer A, Arikan T, Coskun A, Kilinc M. Plasma cystatin-C and beta-2 microglobulin levels in severe preeclampsia. Eur J ObstetGynecolReprod Biol. 2010; 149 (2):147–149.

20. Vikse BE, Irgens LM, Leivestad T, Skjaerven R, Iversen BM. Preeclampsia and the risk of end-stage renal disease. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359 (8):800–809.

21. Ayoola OO, Olusanya BO. Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C and serum creatinine for detecting kidney dysfunction in Nigerian women with preeclampsia. Niger J ClinPract. 2020; 23 (1):40–46.

22. Ike SO, Okoye OC. Kidney disease in Nigeria: a review of epidemiologic data from renal registries and population-based studies. Int J NephrolRenovasc Dis. 2015; 8:7–19.

23. Muli AM, Obimbo MM, Musoke RN. Maternal serum cystatin C as a marker of renal function in pregnancy complicated by preeclampsia. Afr Health Sci. 2021; 21(1):122–129.

24. Hsu CY, Bansal N. Measured GFR as a confirmatory test for estimated GFR. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011; 22(12):2295–2303.

25. Garovic VD, August P. Preeclampsia and renal disease: emerging links. CurrOpinNephrolHypertens. 2016; 25(2):91–95.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-03

Issue

Section

Original Articles

How to Cite

Kidney Function in Normotensive and Preeclamptic Pregnancies: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study in Abeokuta, Nigeria. (2025). The Nigerian Health Journal, 25(2), 816-823. https://doi.org/10.71637/tnhj.v25i2.1091

Similar Articles

1-10 of 318

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.